Auchtoon!

Originally published in the Ann Arbor News, Bay City Times, Flint Journal, Grand Rapids Press, Jackson Citizen Patriot, Kalamazoo Gazette, Muskegon Chronicle, Saginaw News
December 8, 2013

There’s a lot involved with this taking personal responsibility for your finances stuff, and it sure ain’t getting any easier. My brother and I were discussing this recently. Well, lamenting really. We’re both reasonably capable adults, but we both feel absolutely overwhelmed with managing retirement plans. The choices, the options, the opportunities to screw up  – it’s exhausting to even think about! But instead of drawing a cartoon about a whiner like me, I decided to make fun of those who are gung-ho in embracing this “personal responsibility” lifestyle, because at best it can make you the guy you don’t want to get in a conversation with at a holiday party and at worst it can consume your whole life.

The local/Michigan angle to this (in case you were wondering) was the recent decision to move forward with the Detroit bankruptcy case. As a result, retirees from the City of Detroit can expect their pensions to be reduced in some way. It’s easy  to think, “well I don’t have a pension!” or “they should have been better prepared” or “I’m sure they are all thieves and welfare cheaters anyway” depending on how far down the I-Hate-Detroit road you want to go. But we would all do well to keep in mind that the same financial forces that have done away with pensions are the ones that will eventually end your employer-based health insurance. Yep, more choices to manage! Wheeee!

Originally published in the Ann Arbor News, Bay City Times, Flint Journal, Grand Rapids Press, Jackson Citizen Patriot, Kalamazoo Gazette, Muskegon Chronicle, Saginaw News
December 1, 2013

First, apologies to my wife’s Uncle Bob — I wasn’t drawing you! “Uncle Bob” just seemed like the best name for a grouchy old guy. Wait… that didn’t come out right either.

Anyway, the US Treasury Department recently announced its intention to sell off its remaining stock in General Motors and bring to an end the bailout process that began five years ago. There are some (Mitt Romney famously) who still contend that the bailout was a bad idea. True, taxpayers will have lost an estimated $10 billion on the deal. But with a healthy and successful GM and vibrant US auto industry, arguing against the bailout seems more and more, well, old and grouchy.

Originally published in the Ann Arbor News, Bay City Times, Flint Journal, Grand Rapids Press, Jackson Citizen Patriot, Kalamazoo Gazette, Muskegon Chronicle, Saginaw News
November 24, 2013

It should come as no surprise that this editorial cartooning thing comes easiest when something really and truly ticks you off. Such is the case when Secretary of State Ruth Johnson recently proposed that Michigan consider some transparency in the financing of so called “issue ads” (Issue ads are those campaign spots that can serve up whatever slanderous bile they want so long as they don’t endorse a candidate. And as a bonus for being slimy, they don’t have to reveal who paid for the ad.)  The Supreme Court left it up to the states to decide whether the money source must be revealed. Many states require it. At this point, Michigan does not.

And it doesn’t look likely that Michigan will. Because almost immediately after Johnson floated the transparency idea, Senator Arlan Meekhof and senate leader Randy Richardville rammed through a bill to do exactly the opposite — keep the revenue sources anonymous and then doubling the amount allowed to be given. The defense for this (and a rather cynical one at that) is free speech or the claim that donation sources need to be hidden because otherwise those who make them might feel uncomfortable. First, I’m sure they type who have the likes of Senator Meekhof do their bidding are plenty lawyered up to deal with the consequences of being revealed. Second, is it not a virtue to stand up  for what you believe in?

Hey, my friend and “Teardown: Memoir of a Vanishing City” author, Gordon Young featured me in a post on his FlintExpats site:
http://www.flintexpats.com/2013/11/john-auchter-cartoon-desk-and-end-of-era.html

It’s about the recent cartoon I did about the last remnant of the AC Spark Plug complex in Flint recently closing down. But there is also an interesting bit about my drawing table, which happens to have a AC Spark Plug connection. Check it out. And buy Gordie’s book! Christmas is coming — great stocking stuffer for that Flintoid (or Flintoid wannabe) on you list!

Originally published in the Ann Arbor News, Bay City Times, Flint Journal, Grand Rapids Press, Jackson Citizen Patriot, Kalamazoo Gazette, Muskegon Chronicle, Saginaw News
November 17, 2013

Hmmm… This is one of those cartoons that felt like it had a strong statement when I did it. Now it seems a little mushy. The point is that politicians on both sides of the aisle tend to be much better with coming up with good ideas than actually executing them. Entitlements are a perfect example. It’s fun to propose programs, project, subsidies, but it’s a drag to figure out how to run them and fund them. Did you guys get that? Well, it was a great idea when I came up with it, but I guess I didn’t feel like figuring out the best way to draw it…..

Originally published in the Ann Arbor News, Bay City Times, Flint Journal, Grand Rapids Press, Jackson Citizen Patriot, Kalamazoo Gazette, Muskegon Chronicle, Saginaw News
November 10, 2013

Growing up in Flint, there were many, many GM facilities scattered in and around town. But the four main complexes were Buick, Chevy in the Hole, Truck and Bus, and AC Spark Plug. Truck and Bus is the only one now still functioning (and actually doing quite well turning out Silverados). Most of what was AC Spark Plug has been gone for quite some time, but the last piece (which final name was Delphi Flint East) is no more. I thought it appropriate to draw a cartoon to mark the occasion. But I didn’t want to do the typical reminiscing of the good ol’ days or the lamenting of the loss thereof. No, the main reaction I had was to the folks not from Flint (or Detroit or Saginaw) who confidently chime in to tell us who was solely to blame: “It was the unions!” “It was General Motors!” “It was the lazy workers!” “It was the incompetent management.”

Yeah, sure. All that and more. But if you’re not from Flint, you have no real appreciation for the subtleties and complexities of how things turned out the way they have. And it’s more than a little annoying to have somebody tell you with great confidence how AC Spark Plug would be a humming beehive of activity if only they had been in charge. I don’t think so. There are historical reasons for why things turned out the way they did. There were some very bad decisions, but there were also some great successes, and we would be wise to learn from both.

So the two folks choking each other to death is more of a cautionary tale for those who have never been to Flint but think they know exactly what happened there. I purposely didn’t draw them as a blue collar guy with a lunch bucket and hard hat, and a rich guys with a top hat and monocle. That’s the past. Future problems are more likely to be caused by folks who appear relatively the same but are still playing the blame game.

Originally published in the Ann Arbor News, Bay City Times, Flint Journal, Grand Rapids Press, Jackson Citizen Patriot, Kalamazoo Gazette, Muskegon Chronicle, Saginaw News
November 3, 2013

My intention here was to show Michiganders’ greater interest in the next manager of the Detroit Tigers than in the next mayor of our largest city (which, for a while anyway, is still Detroit). The joke kind of hinged on the Tuesday election coming first. Alas for me, the Tigers found their manager and the news leaked Sunday. But I think more people probably knowing Brad Ausmus (a journeyman player and first-time manager) than the mayoral candidates (Mike Duggan and Benny Napoleon) also proves the point.

Originally published in the Ann Arbor News, Bay City Times, Flint Journal, Grand Rapids Press, Jackson Citizen Patriot, Kalamazoo Gazette, Muskegon Chronicle, Saginaw News
October 27, 2013

Credit for the initial observation goes to my friend, Mert. Growing up in Michigan, it seemed like Richard Austin was the de facto Secretary of State (which is what Michigan calls its department of motor vehicles). He was the guy with his picture on the wall, so he must be the guy we elect. And checking Wikipedia, true enough, he served from 1970 to 1994. He may have been a fine fellow and done some good things, but from a general citizen point of view, going to the Secretary of State office back then was a decidedly unhappy experience. So was there a great hue and cry to stop the existence of the Secretary of State? To obstruct it? To defund it? To kill it? Well, yeah, probably. (We were no less prone to emotional reactions back then.) But did we listen? No. No instead we elected leaders to improve the situation and now — again from my general citizen point of view — dealing with the Secretary of State office is not so bad. I think there’s a lesson there somewhere….

http://www.everydaycitizen.com/2013/10/an_interview_with_cartoonist_john_auchter.html

My friend and fellow cartoonist Angelo Lopez did an interview of me for his blog, Everyday Citizen. I met Angelo at the editorial cartoonist convention last year.  I had seen his work and admired it for some time. Two main reasons: one, it’s good. Two, it’s something I don’t (or can’t) do: his artwork is clean and precise and his ideas are to the point, often without dialogue. The fact that he’s also a visual artist explains the elegance in his illustration.

• Check out his Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/AngeloLopezIllustration
• Check out his editorial cartoons: http://editorialcartoonists.com/cartoon/display.cfm?cartoonist=LopezA

Originally published in the Ann Arbor News, Bay City Times, Flint Journal, Grand Rapids Press, Jackson Citizen Patriot, Kalamazoo Gazette, Muskegon Chronicle, Saginaw News
October 20, 2013

So the US Supreme Court has agreed to decide an affirmative action case coming out of Michigan. Here’re the details, but in short, Michigan passed a constitutional amendment back in 2006 stating that race cannot be considered as part of college admissions. Colleges like the University of Michigan argue that this has had the net effect of reducing the number of minorities on campus. Those who support the law, such as Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette, say it prevents discrimination. Like most things having to do with race in America, it’s messier than that.

What makes the issue so difficult is a lack of trust. The first panel is an actual quote from Bill Schuette, and I want to believe that he knows of better ways to promote diversity, but in the articles I read, he didn’t elaborate much. So, yeah, I get it — affirmative action and specific set asides seem unfair and unworkable in the 21st century, but why exactly can’t race be taken into some account for admissions purposes? Relatives of alumni (legacy students) are given preferential treatment, and that tips the balance toward existing racial patterns. Why must it be illegal to consider race? Is there actually a better way to promote diversity?

But most importantly, did anybody get the Blues Brothers references in the cartoon?