Auchtoon!Trusting the Experts
Last week Michigan Public had a story about the EPA’s latest Climate Indicators Report and how it shows significant changes for Michigan and the Great Lakes as a whole. Go ahead and read it. I’ll wait.
OK, you’re busy. And there is a lot to think through. That’s because it was created from data collected and vetted by scientific experts — highly trained teams of individuals whose literal job it is to put these reports together. What’s more, it is the job of the entire scientific community to test and question and poke and prod to try to find errors, biases, and false claims in those reports (and it fills them with delight when they find something so there is every incentive to make them airtight).
Meanwhile, there is an ongoing battle in the country as a whole over education and what exactly we should be teaching our children. The only thing that approaches consensus is that STEM-related courses (science, technology, engineering, math) should be a priority.
And yet, we routinely dismiss the scientists, technologists, engineers, and mathematicians when their expert recommendations do not align to our feelings and desires. The Supreme Court seemingly validated this by throwing out the so-called Chevron doctrine last month.
We’ve been doing a fine job of chasing teachers and nurses out of their professions. Are scientists and researchers next?
Jon Lunderberg said,
July 12, 2024 @ 12:07 pm
John,
The Chevron decision by SCOTUS didn’t have anything to do with STEM or the scientists, technologists, engineers, and mathematicians or climate change.
Where is the validation?
Why Chevron was overturned: The EPA required that the herring boats pay for the observers on their vessels to collect data about their catches and monitor for overfishing. Congress never intended for the fishing operations to pay for the observers and that is why Chevron was overturned.
Jon